What is it like to experience the frightening auditory and visual hallucinations characteristic of schizophrenia? Yellowlees and Cook (2006)
developed a virtual reality program in Second Life based on interviews with schizophrenic patients. The researchers used this as a tool to educate the general public about schizophrenia, in order to increase understanding and reduce stigma. A video sample of the program can be viewed below.Popout
As you can see, these hallucinations
are straight out of a horror movie or a terrible nightmare, except they reflect the reality of living with schizophrenia:
- Multiple voices, occasionally overlapping, criticizing the user
- A newspaper in which the word “death” would stand out in a headline
- A floor that would fall away, leaving the user walking on stepping stones above a bank of clouds
- A television that would play a political speech, but then criticize the user and encourage suicide
- A gun that would appear under a cone of light and pulse, with associated voices telling the user to take the gun and commit suicide
- A mirror in which a person’s reflection would appear to die, becoming gaunt with bleeding eyes
The authors also provide information about accessing the Virtual Hallucination
Persons with other psychiatric disorders may be plagued by voices saying they’re worthless and directing them to commit suicide, but the voice is a self-deprecating internal monologue and clearly identified as their own (as in nonpsychotic unipolar and bipolar depression). The issue in schizophrenia is one of reality monitoring
, so that internal thoughts and impulses are interpreted as external to the self.
The most common type of hallucination is hearing voices
. To determine which brain regions are implicated, a number of neuroimaging studies have scanned participants with schizophrenia while they are actively experiencing auditory hallucinations, compared to the non-hallucinating state (Allen et al., 2008
;Kompus et al., 2011
;Jardri et al., 2011
). A common finding is increased activation of auditory cortex in the absence of external stimulation, along with greater activity in Broca’s area
(speech production) and the medial temporal lobe
(memory). One interpretation of this pattern is that memory retrieval triggers aberrant auditory perceptual experiences. Another is that inner speech is attributed to external sources due to defective self-monitoring.
A new study by Kim and colleagues (2012)
took a different approach. They constructed a virtual reality environment in the scanner to produce the illusion of burning flames, and compared the neural responses of schizophrenic and control participants. The experimental setup is shown below.Fig. 1A (adapted from Kim et al., 2012). The virtual flame illusion.A participant could see his/her body through a head-mounted display (HMD) during the “flame off” block and watched a superimposed, animated image of a virtual flame on the right or left index finger during the “flame on” block.
The participants were 16 schizophrenic patients with mild to moderately severe symptoms and 17 controls. They were instructed that the purpose of the experiment was to examine the brain’s response to “observing the body.” However, they werenot
informed about the potentially frightening illusion:
Participants were not told about the virtual flame and were instructed to observe their body without closing their eyes. As shown in Fig. 1, the experiment used a blocked paradigm and consisted of two conditions: 1) a ‘flame off’ block (30 s), during which only a real-time body image was presented, and 2) a ‘flame on’ block (16 s), during which the virtual flame was generated by a computer in real-time and superimposed on the participant’s index finger. The blocks were alternatively repeated 8 times, and the presentation of the flame on the left or the right finger was counterbalanced.
Fig. 1B (adapted from Kim et al., 2012). fMRI task sequence. The experiment used a blocked design and alternated between ‘flame off’ blocks (30 s) and ‘flame on’ blocks (16 s).
Lest you think this situation skirts the boundaries of unethical (as I did), the study was approved by the local institutional review board and subjects signed[semi-]
informed consent statements.
After the fMRI session was over, the participants filled out a questionnaire which indicated (A) the strength of their reactions from 1 (“not at all”) to 7 (“extremely strong”), and (B) how much their feelings changed when the blocks were repeated, rated from 1 (“severely attenuated”) to 7 (“severely augmented”):
After scanning, most participants reported that they initially felt the ‘flame on their finger,’ but then the feeling disappeared after realizing that the flame was not real… . …both patient and control groups showed similar subjective responses to the task stimuli: moderate strength in feeling the flame (4.6 ± 1.9 and 3.8 ± 1.8, respectively) and slight attenuation in flame strength over time (3.3 ± 1.8 and 2.6 ± 1.3, respectively).[The group differences were not statistically significant.]
The data analysis strategy went beyond the standard boxcar comparison between “flame on” and “flame off.” Instead, the authors…
…considered that the process of virtual flame-specific learning (i.e., gaining insight into the reality of a visual image) might be reflected as a linear or quadratic function of fMRI signal changes. A linear function could reflect repetition enhancement, sensitization/repetition attenuation, or habituation to the stimulus. A quadratic function could reflect transitions between repetition enhancement and repetition attenuation.
The brain activation differences between groups were not all that spectacular, once you discard all the p<.001 uncorrected regions that were reported in Table 2. What was left?
…only five areas including the left anterior prefrontal cortex, left occipito-temporal junction, left occipital gyrus, right amygdala, and left cerebellum were included. As depicted inFig. 2,the control group demonstrated transitions from repetition enhancement to attenuation in these five brain regions, in contrast to the lack of enhancement and attenuation in the patient group [i.e., a flat response].
Fig. 2 (Kim et al., 2012). Changing patterns of brain activity related to the virtual flame across time in patients with schizophrenia and in healthy controls. The selected regions were significant in the two-sample tests with the quadratic repetition-variant response at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected: the anterior prefrontal cortex (APFC), occipito-temporal junction (OTJ), occipital cortex (OC), amygdala (AMG), and cerebellum (CER). Rt., right; and Lt., left
Have we come away with a better understanding of the neural processes involved in gaining insight into unreality? Becoming aware of the fact that an unexpected and alarming visual illusion isn’t real differs from internally generated hallucinations, of course, but the authors suggest that:
Patients with schizophrenia may use a salience-related region1 instead of reality monitoring-related regions[anterior medial PFC]to react to the unusual stimuli, and this peculiarity of the neural processes may be related to vulnerability to psychosis.
The salience-related region (anterior cingulate cortex
) did not survive FDR correction
for multiple comparisons.